Imagine being accused of a crime.
No witness saw you.
No evidence can prove your guilt.
Then someone says:
“Go and swear before the deity if you are innocent.”
For many people in traditional Igbo society, that moment inspired greater fear than standing before a human judge.
But why?
A judge can be deceived.
Witnesses can lie.
Evidence can disappear.
The guilty may escape.
The innocent may be condemned.
Human justice has limits.
Traditional oath-taking rested on a different conviction.
The deity was believed to know the truth, even when no human being did. A false oath was not merely a lie—it was believed to be an offence against the spiritual authority before whom it was sworn.
That belief shaped how many disputes ended.
Some people confessed before reaching the shrine.
Others chose reconciliation or compensation rather than swear what they believed to be a false oath.
Whether this fear arose from religious conviction, community expectations, psychological pressure, or a combination of these, its influence on traditional society was undeniable.
Ironically, people sometimes swear to tell the truth in modern courts and still knowingly lie.
Yet in many traditional communities, the mere suggestion of swearing before certain deities was enough to make some people reconsider.
What changed?
Did people become less fearful…
Or did they simply begin to fear different things?
This is not an argument against modern justice. It is an invitation to reflect on the relationship between law, belief, conscience, and accountability.
If someone fears lying before a deity more than lying before a judge, where does the greater power truly lie—in the courtroom, or in the human conscience?
#IgboHistory #IgboCulture #TraditionalJustice #AfricanHistory #jollyonyeka
Leave a Reply