Author: onyekachi.iwuji@gmail.com

We grew up believing that having more than one wife was against God’s will.

But was it really against Igbo tradition?

Long before missionaries arrived, polygyny was a recognized part of Igbo society. It wasn’t considered shameful or immoral. It was a cultural institution that served social, economic, and family purposes.

Then everything changed.

If you wanted baptism, Holy Communion, child presentation, or certain privileges in the Church, there were expectations about the kind of marriage you should have.

What I still struggle to understand is this: How does the marital status of parents affect an innocent child seeking to be presented before God?

If you wanted to hold leadership positions in the Church, there were also expectations about the kind of marriage you should have.

Gradually, many of us began to see our own customs through foreign eyes.

Today, we often condemn our ancestors for practicing the traditions they inherited, while embracing customs introduced from outside our land.

Then I remembered a passage that raises an interesting question.

The Bible says that a time would come when seven women would take hold of one man, asking only to bear his name (Isaiah 4:1).

If one man having multiple wives is always portrayed as evil, why does Scripture describe such a situation without making that the focus of its condemnation?

So I ask:

Did Christianity replace Igbo marriage traditions?

Or did it simply introduce a different understanding of marriage that many people chose to embrace?

Whether you support monogamy or polygyny today is your personal choice.

But should we rewrite history and pretend that traditional Igbo society was always monogamous?

Let’s have an honest conversation.

#IgboCulture #AfricanHistory #Tradition #Christianity #Culture #Identity #HistoryMatters #ThinkAgain #Debate #jollyonyeka

Christians teach that Jesus is God incarnate—God who became flesh.

The Bible says:

“The Word was God.” (John 1:1)

Then it says:

“The Word became flesh and dwelt among us.” (John 1:14)

Thomas even called Jesus:

“My Lord and my God!” (John 20:28)

So far, the message seems clear: Jesus is God.

But then Jesus said:

“Not that anyone has seen the Father except He who is from God; He has seen the Father.”(John 6:46)

And John also wrote:

“No one has ever seen God…” (John 1:18)

Now here’s what confuses me.

If Jesus is truly God…

If He is God made flesh…

Didn’t Peter see Him?

Didn’t John see Him?

Didn’t the Pharisees see Him?

Didn’t Pilate see Him?

Didn’t the soldiers who crucified Him see Him?

Didn’t thousands see Him teach, heal the sick, and raise the dead?

Then why does Jesus speak as though the Father is someone He alone has seen?

Does this sound like someone speaking as God, or like someone speaking about another Person?

If Jesus is God, why didn’t He simply say:

“No one has seen Me except those standing before Me.”

Instead, He said:

“No one has seen the Father except He who is from God.”

How do you reconcile these verses?

I’m not attacking Christianity.

I’m asking a sincere question that deserves a sincere biblical answer.

Let’s discuss—with Scripture, reason, and respect.

#Christianity #BibleStudy #Faith #Truth #ThinkAgain #Debate #Questions #jollyonyeka

I’ve been asking myself a question that I can’t seem to shake.

Jesus said:

“No one comes to the Father except through me.” (John 14:6)

But then I remembered my ancestors.

Long before Christianity reached Igbo land, they believed in Chukwu, the Supreme Creator. They woke at dawn, looked to the heavens, gave thanks, prayed for protection, and entrusted their lives to God according to the knowledge they had.

Then they died.

So where are they?

Did they perish simply because they were born before missionaries brought Christianity to our land?

Or would a just God judge them according to the light they had?

Now let’s bring the question closer to home.

I am a Christian today because I was born into a Christian family.

Had I been born into a Muslim family, I might sincerely believe Islam is the truth.

Had I been born into a Hindu family, I might sincerely believe Hinduism is the truth.

Had I been born into a Jewish family, I might sincerely believe Judaism is the truth.

Each of us is often convinced that our religion is the true one.

But how much of that conviction comes from truth… and how much comes from where we happened to be born?

If salvation depends on knowing Christ, what happens to the person who never truly had that opportunity?

If God is perfectly just, how does He judge someone who sincerely sought Him but never knew Jesus?

These are not questions of hatred.

They are questions of justice.

Perhaps the harder question is not whether my religion is true.

Perhaps the harder question is:

If I had been born into another religion, would I still be as certain that I had found the truth?

Let’s have an honest conversation—without insults, without fear, and without pretending these questions don’t exist.

#Christianity #Religion #Faith #IgboCulture #History #Truth #ThinkAgain #Debate #God #jollyonyeka

Modernization has brought us roads, hospitals, education, and technology. For that, I give it credit.

But must we surrender our identity in the name of “progress”?

In the past, we knew the difference between a Chief and a Lolo. A Chief held the title. A Lolo was the wife of a Chief. That was our tradition.

Today, a man who is not a Chief can watch his wife receive a chieftaincy title. So what do we call the couple now—Mr. and Chief Mrs.? Doesn’t that turn our tradition upside down? It’s like leaving the head and breaking the neck. Or do we simply pretend nothing has changed?

This is how, in my opinion, our tradition has been turned upside down.

From my understanding of our customs, chieftaincy was a mark of honour. People were recognized for integrity, sacrifice, charity, and service. The community identified deserving individuals, and the custodians of tradition honoured them.

Today, it often appears that money, gifts, and influence can secure titles, and some recipients even choose the title they want. If so, we have reduced a sacred institution to something that can be bought.

I believe this is one of the things that desecrates the land and sets a community backward. Our ancestors taught that ignoring sacred customs brought consequences. Whether people believe it or not, negligence and ignorance come at a cost.

Who will speak up? Who will remind our people of the cost of abandoning our customs? Those who once defended them are now dismissed as “superstitious.” Who, then, will protect our heritage?

Our traditional rulers are custodians of our culture, not agents of its replacement.

What do you think—is this genuine progress, or are we slowly replacing our heritage?

#IgboCulture #AfricanTradition #CultureMatters #TraditionVsModernity #PreserveOurHeritage #Customs #Debate #Identity #jollyonyeka

The irony of God turning Lot’s wife into a pillar of salt has always fascinated me.

If the purpose was punishment, why salt?

Why not a tree? A stone? Charcoal? Dust? Or simply let her die?

Of all the things she could have become, why a pillar of salt?

Then I discovered something else.

The place where Lot’s wife was turned into a pillar of salt is traditionally believed to have been near what we know today as the Dead Sea. But here’s the interesting part: in the Bible, it wasn’t called the Dead Sea. It was called the Salt Sea. The name Dead Sea came much later.

Now that made me pause.

Was it simply because the area was rich in salt deposits?

Or was there a deeper message hidden in God’s choice?

Salt is one of the most symbolic substances in Scripture. It represents preservation, covenant, purity, sacrifice, and even believers themselves: “You are the salt of the earth.”

Yet in this story, the very same salt becomes the symbol of judgment.

Coincidence?

Or was God communicating something far beyond the punishment itself?

Sometimes the smallest details in Scripture raise the biggest questions.

So I’ll leave you with the same question that has continued to puzzle me:

Why salt?

#BibleStudy #BiblicalMysteries #Genesis #Faith #ChristianDiscussion #Scripture #jollyonyeka

We are told that Satan rebelled against God and was cast out of heaven.

Yet after his expulsion, he still appears before God in the Book of Job. He still tempts. He still deceives. He still accuses. He still possesses enough power to challenge humanity.

If that is true, then what exactly did he lose?

More importantly…

If God permits a supernatural being—one far more powerful than any human—to test us, why are we judged when we fall?

Imagine placing a child in a wrestling ring with a heavyweight champion and then blaming the child for losing.

Before anyone says, “We have free will,” remember this:

Lucifer also had free will.

He lived in God’s presence.

He saw God’s glory firsthand.

Yet he still chose rebellion.

If an anointed cherub in heaven could fall, what chance did Adam and Eve truly have?

Does justice require equal strength between the tempter and the tempted?

Or is there something about God’s judgment that we have not fully understood?

I am not questioning God’s righteousness.

I am questioning whether we have asked enough questions about it.

What do you think?

#BibleStudy #BiblicalMysteries #ChristianDiscussion #Faith #QuestionsThatMatter #Theology #Scripture #jollyonyeka

Would He Do It Again?

“Something greater than the temple is here.” — Matthew 12:6

Some of what I see in the name of Christianity today makes me wonder whether Jesus would recognize it.

Multiple offerings. Endless “special” collections. Constant fundraising dressed in different names. Promises of miracles tied to financial giving. Fear, guilt, and emotional pressure replacing cheerful generosity.

Sometimes I ask myself:

Has giving become an act of worship, or has worship become a strategy for giving?

Jesus did not say,

“My house shall be called a fundraising center.”

He said,

“My house shall be called a house of prayer.” (Matthew 21:13)

Then He added:

“But you have made it a den of robbers.”

Paul taught:

“Each of you should give what you have decided in your heart to give, not reluctantly or under compulsion.” (2 Corinthians 9:7)

If people are manipulated through fear, guilt, or promises of guaranteed prosperity to part with their hard-earned money, is that truly biblical giving?

I sometimes describe such practices as “OBT”—Obtaining By Tricks: using spiritual language to influence people into giving beyond what they have freely decided in their hearts.

If that description is unfair, then Scripture will expose it.

But if it is accurate, then perhaps Jesus’ question is not for the money changers alone—it is for every generation that risks turning God’s house into a marketplace.

Not every church is guilty of this. But every church should be willing to examine itself in the light of Christ’s words.

What would Jesus overturn if He walked into our churches today?

#Christianity #BibleStudy #Faith #Church #TruthMatters #MercyOverSacrifice #HouseOfPrayer #jollyonyeka

Jesus defended David when he and his men ate the consecrated bread that, according to the law, was reserved for the priests.

Then He made three astonishing statements:

“Something greater than the temple is here.” — Matthew 12:6

“I desire mercy, not sacrifice.” — Matthew 12:7

“For the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath.” — Matthew 12:8

If Jesus is greater than the temple and Lord of the Sabbath, shouldn’t His interpretation carry more weight than our traditions?

Yet today, some churches forbid members from working on the Sabbath, even in cases of genuine necessity.

Others deny Holy Communion to believers because they are judged not to be in a “state of grace.”

Now here is my question:

If David was not condemned for eating the holy bread reserved for priests, why should a repentant believer be denied the bread and cup that Christ Himself instituted?

Paul wrote:

“Let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.” — 1 Corinthians 11:28

Notice what Paul did not say. He did not write, “Examine yourself, and therefore stay away.” He said, “Examine yourself… and so let him eat.”

Have we turned self-examination into self-exclusion?

Have we become more protective of sacred symbols than the mercy they were designed to proclaim?

If Jesus could place mercy above ceremonial restriction, are we certain He would approve of every barrier we have placed around His table?

Matthew 12:1–8 | 1 Corinthians 11:17–34

What are your thoughts?

#Faith #BibleStudy #MercyOverSacrifice #TruthMatters #jollyonyeka

Jesus told Peter:

“Go to the sea… take the first fish… you will find a coin. Take it and give it to them for My tax and yours.” (Matthew 17:27)

That was a supernatural miracle involving money.

Yet Jesus never taught His disciples to perform miracles to become wealthy.

He never instructed them to use supernatural power as a method of paying bills whenever they were broke.

So here is the question:

If God miraculously provides money to meet a genuine need, we call it a miracle.

But if a person claims to use spiritual power to produce money on demand, what should we call it?

Where does a miracle end and magic begin?

Is the difference the source of the power… or simply the result?

Jesus also said:

“Whoever is not against us is for us.” (Mark 9:40)

So should every supernatural act be accepted simply because it appears to solve a problem?

Or should every spirit, every miracle, and every claim be tested?

Perhaps the greatest danger is not that people believe in miracles.

Perhaps it is that many no longer ask where the miracle came from.

Matthew 17:24–27 | Mark 9:40 | 1 John 4:1

Thoughts?

#BibleStudy #Christianity #Faith #Discernment #TestTheSpirits #TruthMatters #Miracles #SeekTruth #KingdomPerspective #ScriptureFirst #ThinkBiblically #jollyonyeka

Long ago, the birds decided to hold a magnificent feast in the sky. Every bird was invited, but Mbe (the tortoise) had no wings.

Pretending to be humble, he pleaded with the birds to lend him a feather each. Moved by pity, they agreed, and Mbe flew with them to the feast.

Before they arrived, Mbe said, “It is our custom that every visitor should take a new name. From today, call me ‘All of You.’”

The birds thought nothing of it.

When the hosts welcomed their guests, they announced, “This feast has been prepared for all of you!”

Immediately Mbe stood up.

“You heard them,” he said. “The feast belongs to me.”

Ignoring the hungry birds, he ate the finest yams, the richest soups, the juiciest meat, and drank the sweetest palm wine until little remained.

The birds were furious. One after another, they collected the feathers they had lent him and flew home, leaving Mbe stranded in the sky.

Desperate, Mbe begged a passing bird to tell his wife to spread soft things on the ground so he could jump safely. But the bird, still angry, told her to spread stones and hard objects instead.

Trusting the message, Mbe’s wife obeyed.

Mbe leapt from the sky…

He crashed onto the stones, and his shell shattered into countless pieces.

An old healer gathered the broken fragments and carefully stitched them back together. That, the elders say, is why a tortoise’s shell is covered with cracks and patterns to this day.

Wisdom is a gift. But when wisdom is ruled by greed, it becomes self-destruction. A feast shared creates friends; a feast stolen leaves a person eating alone.

#IgboFolklore #AfricanFolktales #Mbe #AfricanWisdom #Storytelling #Culture #Tradition #MoralStories #jollyonyeka